Start-up Valuation Gap


Valuations are quantitative by nature. They are heavily reliant on numerical inputs; valuations improve with additional financial information. This is why start-ups can be difficult to value during certain stages of development. Somewhere between seed funding and the emergence of sustainable financial performance, most start-ups encounter a period when there are few reliable numbers to work with. Below, we discuss those valuation approaches that are better suited to navigating this Start-up Valuation Gap.

Guideline Transactions: While no two companies are identical, acquisitions of comparable start-ups can provide useful points of reference. Absent usable financials, companies can be compared based on IP portfolios, number of subscribers or drug pipelines. It may feel like horse trading and exact matches are rare, but a couple of close comparables can support a relatively accurate valuation.

Cost Approach: While most hard-charging entrepreneurs will disagree, until a company passes a meaningful proof-of-concept milestone, a start-up is valued on a time and materials basis, if that. A potential acquirer may add an additional premium for timing and the cost of trial-and-error, but will mostly view early stage technology as something they could recreate internally.

Transactions in Start-up’s Own Stock: Not unlike calculating market capitalization of publicly traded companies, start-up valuation can be derived based on the value of its individual shares. To utilize this method we have to assume that the transaction was fairly negotiated at arm’s length and by a professional investor. Not all equity shares are equal and simple multiplication, while widely used, rarely works. However, a well-negotiated round of financing or a secondary market sale can provide a reliable value indicator.

P.S. Practitioners and academics have used the income approach and Monte Carlo simulations to tackle the challenges of start-up valuation. The income approach can be quite reliable in certain industries such as drug development. Monte Carlo simulation is designed to take uncertainty into account. It is not widely accepted, in part due to the limited practical utility of such complex analyses for early stage start-ups.

More Updates

Navigating SAFE Valuations

Neither “Safe” nor “Simple,” these Simple Agreements for Future Equity are convertible debt instruments that are often misunderstood and hard to value.

7 Areas to Transform Your Financial Reporting Valuation

Creating shareholder value is the goal of most for-profit entities, where value is viewed in a strictly financial sense.  In the world of startups and VCs, this means maximizing exit valuations. That exit valuation number is of fundamental importance. Exit valuations are built over time. Thus, tracking valuations is critical.  Companies have many opportunities to track their valuations, from upgraded

About Financial Forecast

A financial forecast is a centerpiece of many valuations.  It answers the principal question: “Why the business is valuable in the first place?”  In strategic analysis, financial forecast links business strategy and value.  In financial reporting, a financial forecast is a more refined, post-strategic-planning representation of a company’s expected financial performance. 

Schedule a Call

Most new projects will require a brief introductory conversation. Unless you are a returning client asking for an update to a old valuation, please use the calendar below to schedule a call with us:

Send a Message

We are located in the San Francisco Bay Area, while our clients cover much broader geography, from Southern California to the East Coast and Europe. Please contact us with questions and inquiries. Also, feel free to stop by on your way to the beautiful Sonoma or Napa Valley.

Schedule a Call